You are not logged in.

Announcement

*** NOTICE: forum.openstreetmap.org is being retired. Please request a category for your community in the new ones as soon as possible using this process, which will allow you to propose your community moderators.
Please create new topics on the new site at community.openstreetmap.org. We expect the migration of data will take a few weeks, you can follow its progress here.***

#1 2021-08-15 20:19:04

Hungerburg
Member
Registered: 2020-12-11
Posts: 511

surface ground

Documentation says, something more specific should be used. Currently making a mountain path more precise. It passes several terrains: wood, grass, scree, bare rock. Not wanting to split the path into sections, will surface ground use the terrain as value?

Offline

#2 2021-08-16 06:10:49

GerdP
Member
Registered: 2015-12-18
Posts: 1,972

Re: surface ground

What do you mean with "will surface ground use the terrain as value"?
Do you expect that data consumers will split the way at the boundaries of natural=* areas to convert e.g. natural=grassland to surface=grass for the path? I don't think that any data consumer does that and I see no need for that.
In my eyes, surface=ground means something like "the way is not maintained, it only exists because animals or people use it". In German I would call it Trampelpfad. Often the surface changes every few meters and in that case I would not split the way. If there is a long stretch (say +100m) with a more specific surface then split.

Offline

#3 2021-08-16 08:17:48

Hungerburg
Member
Registered: 2020-12-11
Posts: 511

Re: surface ground

The idea came, German speaking here, as JOSM calls it "Erde", which I'd reverse translate to "soil" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil). "Erde" has a notion of organic material, perhaps though only, because one usually does not see the lower horizons. "Ground" on the other hand to me does not have this connotation, thats why I am asking on the international forum.

I rather not split due to surface alone. Will stick to ground as least common denominator then, where there is a mix; as a positive way to say unpaved. Human consumers still allowed to make their guesses wink

PS: Seems, from the WP article, in ancient Greek, ground and earth are connected, both are "the fundamental stone" (bedrock?)

Offline

#4 2021-08-16 12:11:01

Mateusz Konieczny
Member
Registered: 2013-09-22
Posts: 2,698

Re: surface ground

Hungerburg wrote:

wood, grass, scree, bare rock

I would recommend splitting.

even surface=unpaved or surface=ground would be incorrect here (unless by "wood" you mean "tree roots")

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB