You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#76 2019-08-31 16:26:53
- zstadler
- Moderator
- Registered: 2012-05-05
- Posts: 354
- Website
Re: Changesets reverts
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72336130 marked Ayalon North as motorway once more. Should that be reverted?
Also he forgot to mark all links, but this is another problem...
yrtiniD and I have commented on the changeset. Unless the user responds with a proof of a change in the on-the-ground road signs from blue to red, I would recommend a revert.
Offline
#77 2019-09-01 08:13:30
- Sanniu
- Member
- Registered: 2017-04-19
- Posts: 44
Re: Changesets reverts
Sanniu wrote:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72336130 marked Ayalon North as motorway once more. Should that be reverted?
Also he forgot to mark all links, but this is another problem...yrtiniD and I have commented on the changeset. Unless the user responds with a proof of a change in the on-the-ground road signs from blue to red, I would recommend a revert.
Should we mention somewhere in wiki the status of that part of Ayalon? And may be add the link to the comments of disputed road segments?
I suppose the change war there mostly because of lack of knowledge of local consensus existsence.
Offline
#78 2019-09-01 13:17:16
- yrtimiD
- Moderator
- From: Israel
- Registered: 2010-10-08
- Posts: 253
Re: Changesets reverts
We can setup monitoring of any major road changes and notify (for example to telegram channel). Osm really lacks some kind of pull request flow
Offline
#79 2019-09-03 20:49:31
- yrtimiD
- Moderator
- From: Israel
- Registered: 2010-10-08
- Posts: 253
Re: Changesets reverts
Sanniu wrote:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72336130 marked Ayalon North as motorway once more. Should that be reverted?
Also he forgot to mark all links, but this is another problem...yrtiniD and I have commented on the changeset. Unless the user responds with a proof of a change in the on-the-ground road signs from blue to red, I would recommend a revert.
Reverted. Changeset 74056483
Offline
#80 2019-12-30 12:33:00
- Sanniu
- Member
- Registered: 2017-04-19
- Posts: 44
Re: Changesets reverts
Hi
It seems to me that someone deleted some paths around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284972232
My OSM-search foo is bad , can anyone look for offending changeset?
Thanks
Offline
#81 2019-12-30 13:00:51
- SomeoneElse
- Member
- Registered: 2010-10-13
- Posts: 1,460
Re: Changesets reverts
Potlatch 1 reckons that it was the deletion of this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284971981/history .
(I'll let someone local decide what to do about it!)
Offline
#82 2020-01-01 11:00:37
- Sanniu
- Member
- Registered: 2017-04-19
- Posts: 44
Re: Changesets reverts
Potlatch 1 reckons that it was the deletion of this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284971981/history .
(I'll let someone local decide what to do about it!)
Ok, found changeset by valleyofdawn, commented on it. Thanks for the search!
Offline
#83 2020-09-22 14:49:45
- zstadler
- Moderator
- Registered: 2012-05-05
- Posts: 354
- Website
Re: Changesets reverts
User Vl-Sher created several changesets titled "Translation" that seem to have been made by a non-Hebrew speaker or an automated translation service.
For example, "גבי ימין נמצאים בערוצו של נחל ימין" was translated to "The upper right is on the channel of the right stream"
[For non-Hebrew readers, a proper translation would be "Yemin waterholes are located in Yemin stream"]
In a week's time I'm planning to revert the following changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75302404
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75320752
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75335867
Please post here if you have any objections
Offline
#84 2021-01-10 22:21:39
- zstadler
- Moderator
- Registered: 2012-05-05
- Posts: 354
- Website
Re: Changesets reverts
way 809467090 was part of a hiking route and was deleted, probably by mistake, in changeset 87707762.
I would like some help reverting the deletion of this way, as my skills are not good enough
Offline
#85 2021-01-10 23:24:24
- zstadler
- Moderator
- Registered: 2012-05-05
- Posts: 354
- Website
Re: Changesets reverts
way 809467090 was part of a hiking route and was deleted, probably by mistake, in changeset 87707762.
I would like some help reverting the deletion of this way, as my skills are not good enough
Apparently, the deletion was not done in that changeset. I was able to revert the missing segment .
Thanks yrtimiD for your help!
Offline
#86 2021-01-20 07:45:55
- Sanniu
- Member
- Registered: 2017-04-19
- Posts: 44
Re: Changesets reverts
Change https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96959594 made very strange configuration of HaKalir/Harlap/HaAri junction (Netanya).
The new configuration look bogus. Can anyone local check it?
Offline
#87 2021-01-20 11:45:45
- zstadler
- Moderator
- Registered: 2012-05-05
- Posts: 354
- Website
Re: Changesets reverts
Change https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96959594 made very strange configuration of HaKalir/Harlap/HaAri junction (Netanya).
The new configuration look bogus. Can anyone local check it?
Offline
#88 2021-02-21 11:03:22
- Sanniu
- Member
- Registered: 2017-04-19
- Posts: 44
Re: Changesets reverts
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98673899 from -Ab Alwhwah Ziad added only empty lines over existing road network.
No answer on comment. Should be reverted?
Offline
#89 2021-02-21 12:02:12
- zstadler
- Moderator
- Registered: 2012-05-05
- Posts: 354
- Website
Re: Changesets reverts
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98673899 from -Ab Alwhwah Ziad added only empty lines over existing road network.
No answer on comment. Should be reverted?
For this kind of errors, I would just revert or clean - whatever is easier.
Please let me know if you need any help.
Offline
#90 2021-02-22 10:47:05
- Sanniu
- Member
- Registered: 2017-04-19
- Posts: 44
Re: Changesets reverts
Sanniu wrote:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98673899 from -Ab Alwhwah Ziad added only empty lines over existing road network.
No answer on comment. Should be reverted?For this kind of errors, I would just revert or clean - whatever is easier.
Please let me know if you need any help.
Ok, removed added lines manually. Thanks.
Offline