You are not logged in.

#76 2019-08-31 16:26:53

zstadler
Moderator
Registered: 2012-05-05
Posts: 353
Website

Re: Changesets reverts

Sanniu wrote:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72336130 marked Ayalon North as motorway once more. Should that be reverted?
Also he forgot to mark all links, but this is another problem...

yrtiniD and I have commented on the changeset. Unless the user responds with a proof of a change in the on-the-ground road signs from blue to red, I would recommend a revert.

Offline

#77 2019-09-01 08:13:30

Sanniu
Member
Registered: 2017-04-19
Posts: 42

Re: Changesets reverts

zstadler wrote:
Sanniu wrote:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72336130 marked Ayalon North as motorway once more. Should that be reverted?
Also he forgot to mark all links, but this is another problem...

yrtiniD and I have commented on the changeset. Unless the user responds with a proof of a change in the on-the-ground road signs from blue to red, I would recommend a revert.

Should we mention somewhere in wiki the status of that part of Ayalon? And may be add the link to the comments of disputed road segments?
I suppose the change war there mostly because of lack of knowledge of local consensus existsence.

Offline

#78 2019-09-01 13:17:16

yrtimiD
Moderator
From: Israel
Registered: 2010-10-08
Posts: 253

Re: Changesets reverts

We can setup monitoring of any major road changes and notify (for example to telegram channel). Osm really lacks some kind of pull request flow sad

Offline

#79 2019-09-03 20:49:31

yrtimiD
Moderator
From: Israel
Registered: 2010-10-08
Posts: 253

Re: Changesets reverts

zstadler wrote:
Sanniu wrote:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72336130 marked Ayalon North as motorway once more. Should that be reverted?
Also he forgot to mark all links, but this is another problem...

yrtiniD and I have commented on the changeset. Unless the user responds with a proof of a change in the on-the-ground road signs from blue to red, I would recommend a revert.

Reverted. Changeset 74056483

Offline

#80 2019-12-30 12:33:00

Sanniu
Member
Registered: 2017-04-19
Posts: 42

Re: Changesets reverts

Hi

It seems to me that someone deleted some paths around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284972232
My OSM-search foo is bad sad, can anyone look for offending changeset?

Thanks

Offline

#81 2019-12-30 13:00:51

SomeoneElse
Member
Registered: 2010-10-13
Posts: 1,446

Re: Changesets reverts

Potlatch 1 reckons that it was the deletion of this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284971981/history .
(I'll let someone local decide what to do about it!)

Offline

#82 2020-01-01 11:00:37

Sanniu
Member
Registered: 2017-04-19
Posts: 42

Re: Changesets reverts

SomeoneElse wrote:

Potlatch 1 reckons that it was the deletion of this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284971981/history .
(I'll let someone local decide what to do about it!)

Ok, found changeset by valleyofdawn, commented on it. Thanks for the search!

Offline

#83 2020-09-22 14:49:45

zstadler
Moderator
Registered: 2012-05-05
Posts: 353
Website

Re: Changesets reverts

User Vl-Sher created several changesets titled "Translation" that seem to have been made by a non-Hebrew speaker or an automated translation service.
For example, "גבי ימין נמצאים בערוצו של נחל ימין" was translated to "The upper right is on the channel of the right stream"
[For non-Hebrew readers, a proper translation would be "Yemin waterholes are located in Yemin stream"]

In a week's time I'm planning to revert the following changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75302404
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75320752
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75335867

Please post here if you have any objections

Offline

#84 2021-01-10 22:21:39

zstadler
Moderator
Registered: 2012-05-05
Posts: 353
Website

Re: Changesets reverts

way 809467090 was part of a hiking route and was deleted, probably by mistake, in changeset 87707762.

I would like some help reverting the deletion of this way, as my skills are not good enough sad

Offline

#85 2021-01-10 23:24:24

zstadler
Moderator
Registered: 2012-05-05
Posts: 353
Website

Re: Changesets reverts

zstadler wrote:

way 809467090 was part of a hiking route and was deleted, probably by mistake, in changeset 87707762.

I would like some help reverting the deletion of this way, as my skills are not good enough sad

Apparently, the deletion was not done in that changeset. I was able to revert the missing segment .

Thanks yrtimiD for your help!

Offline

#86 2021-01-20 07:45:55

Sanniu
Member
Registered: 2017-04-19
Posts: 42

Re: Changesets reverts

Change https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96959594 made very strange configuration of HaKalir/Harlap/HaAri junction (Netanya).
The new configuration look bogus. Can anyone local check it?

Offline

#87 2021-01-20 11:45:45

zstadler
Moderator
Registered: 2012-05-05
Posts: 353
Website

Re: Changesets reverts

Sanniu wrote:

Change https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96959594 made very strange configuration of HaKalir/Harlap/HaAri junction (Netanya).
The new configuration look bogus. Can anyone local check it?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4695

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB