LS
Ein französischer Mapper gebt jetzt Netzwerke in der Nähe von Toulouse ein. Das sind richtige Knotenpunktnetzwerke mit Namen, keine Zahlen.
Er möchte, dass es gut aussieht und funktioniert in waymarkedtrails, OsmAnd und Knooppuntnet Analyse un Knooppuntnet Planner.
Wir haben noch keinen Konsens über die endgültige Tagging, aber er möchte die Daten bereits eingeben. Vorläufige Lösung:
(auf English, entschuldige)
**guidepost node on its exact position:
*** tag name and ele and whatever you normally put on it (in this case they were already present)
network nodes (= intersections of the ways where the routes end/start)
network:type=node_network
rwn_name=
rwn_ref=o (lowercase letter o)
network routes (mode2node route relations)
network:type=node_network
ref=o-o (lowercase letter o, hyphen, lowercase o)
name=<start node’s rwn_name>-<end node’s rwn_name)
network relation
network:type=node_network
name
operator
… whatever deemed necessary.
Note that network relations are not really necessary any more.
Also, the node2node routes do not really need the name tag. But it looks good in Waymarkedtrails!
The guideposts may be included in the route relations with the role guidepost, but this is not necessary.
This temporary scheme will give no “facts” in Knooppuntnet Analyse, Knooppuntnet Planner will work technically, and Waymarkedtrails and OsmAnd have a reasonable rendering and information popups/sidebar.
Knooppuntnet has been asked to display rwn_name instead of rwn_ref in the result list and in the pfd exports.