Validator - Mismatched street names

Hallo blaubaer11,
als gebürtigem Essener ist mir noch ein krasserer Fall aufgefallen: thyssenkrupp Allee.
Ungewöhnlich ist die Kleinschreibung und die Getrenntschreibung des Straßennamens, z.B. im
Impressum der Firma
Stadtplan und Mietspiegel der Stadt Essen: ThyssenKrupp Allee
Kannst du mal gelegentlich nachsehen, wie es vor Ort aussieht?
Gruß
Reinhard

Könnte etwas dauern, aber werde ich machen…

An alle Fleißigen hier:

Ich hoffe ja, dass ihr bei Berichtigung eines Straßennamens an sich auch nebenbei prüft, ob es zu der Straße auch noch Gebäude mit Adressen, somit addr:street=… gibt, welche zu berichtigen wären.

Am besten kann man das in JOSM mit dem Kartenstil “Coloured Streets” optisch kontrollieren. Ruhig mal ausprobieren …

Denn ansonsten müsste es ja bei ungeänderten addr:street-Objekten massenhaft neue Treffer bei OSM-Suspects geben, oder?

…hat früher geklappt wie erwartet. Die vor Ort befindlichen Straßenschilder zeigen: ThyssenKrupp Allee. Also habe ich die Abweichler in osm auf diese Schreibweise geändert. Ein bißchen komisch ist allerdings, das innerstättische Hinweisschilder, also die rechteckigen, weißen Schilder mit der richtungsweisenden Spitze es so schreiben: thyssenkrupp Allee. Aber
auf den für osm ausschlaggebenden Straßenschilder steht´s wie oben angegeben.

http://81.190.124.187:31337/QA_map/mismatched_street_names_de.html
Now we’re under 800 streets (784, to be precise) - congrats to everyone :slight_smile:

Can you elaborate what makes it a false positive? From what I can see they’re in the same village.
For Poland - we have a register called TERYT with all administrative entities, towns and villages, and street names. While Polish OSM street naming convention deviates sometimes from TERYT (which itself is not consistent - it’s as recorded by acts of municipal law), one can easily find false positives within a single village/town, because there would be two distinct entries. If none, it’s expected that there’s one street name in OSM even if there are different spellings on the ground, because reasonably thinking they represent the same entity (but anybody is free to put alternative spellings in alt_name).

If anybody has nothing to map because of the lockdown, here’s a new address of the tool (dreaded ISP changed IP with the new contract :/).
http://81.190.82.62:31337/QA_map/mismatched_street_names_de.html
As always, feedback (mainly regarding validator logic) is appreciated. I’m surprised this tool didn’t get traction here, so I guess there’s something about German street naming / OSM conventions I am missing.

Hi RicoElectrico.

GREAT, everything seams to be solved in Germany (0 rows)
yesterday we had abbout 77x rows …

Is the script not working ?
I think, still enough work to do :wink:

Greeting derBeKri

Hi BeKri, not sure what went wrong but now it’s fine. Looks like OSM file conversion exited with an error. Thanks for spotting the issue.

An interesting find: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541065065

Yes, works again, nice tool with funny findings, thanks for sharing it.

Jep ;-)) Not shure, what to do with it.

Lg BeKri

Hi, me again

sorry, but maschine isch nott working again :wink:
for 3 days now stoped at 612 rown

Please push your maschine again, thanks !
Lg BeKri

Hi, whatever was causing the issue is now gone. I have read some thread here where people have been reporting problems with Geofabrik extracts being empty. We are now at 574 streets. Thanks for all the fixes :slight_smile:

Hi,
yes, we had 574 rows on 6. 7. and 8. May and I thought: “OK not working”, BUT
by comparing the HTML I realised that from 6. to 7. May
I solved about 7 problems and
someone else created EXACT the samt number of new mistakes, rowcount the same ;-))

from 7. to 8.may nothing changed (also I solved problems)
today/ 9. May we should be at 574-33=541 problems I fixed and
minus some from a person I wrote to (An Der Bicker Hecke; An Der Burg; An Der Römerziegelei)
plus the new mistakes, made in the last 3 days ;-))

HTML ist ready about 05:5x in the morning, but when do you fetch the data and start the Validator ?
IMHO fetching must bei about 23:xx the day befor, right ?

Nice tool and funny problems :sunglasses:

Now we’re down to 407 cases. Here’s a bonus, but hold on to your seats: below are photos of the server.
https://imgur.com/a/3pBk835
This is all basically scrap, including the laptop which was scored years ago by my brother in his school’s e-waste collection box.
It’s surprisingly reliable, barring some 3rd party supply which let out the smoke. I soldered an adapter to an original Lenovo power supply (this is Asus) and it works with no issue since then. Recently I added the fan, and was surprised how this improved air circulation and temps in a mostly enclosed drawer.

I considered switching to a VPS, I don’t care about CPU and RAM so much, but ones with 100 GB+ of SSD are expensive. If you know any cheap options, let me know.

Hahhaaa, great photos, that’s what I not really expected :D:lol:
But so what … never touch a running system …

Looks like in winter it’s also some heating of your sleeping room ?

imho wir are under 400 rows doing some street every day,
but allways doing some fixes or mistakes around, so it takes time.
Most are one changed a streetname becauce of new list and
did not realice that the street has up to 5, 10, 20 parts.

nice tool, good work, perfect server ! :D:lol:

We’re down to 117 street names, many of which have already filled “note” tag to indicate they’re false positives. Good job everyone :slight_smile:

Don’t want to praise me,
but guess who did it :laughing::cool:

Good Job BeKri B-)

Hi,
on the last mile (everything with M missing)
script seams for about 4 days not running …

Could you check, please ?
Thank you

Hi,
me again, server seams to be down …
On more (last) Reset ?

I think, we got the actuell problems (ending with M*),
also it would be good to KEEP the service RUNNING
becauce (my experience) every month
you get 5-10 new mismatched problems to solve.
If it is ok for you, I would install a timeplan for me
to look up every month.

Greetings and thank you again for this useful service
Bernhard

Hi, due to ISP contract renewal, now the IP has changed again, please try 81.190.26.28

While public IP (non-NATed) is a small one-time fee, static IP is paid per month :confused:
Does anybody know any proven and free dynamic DNS services?