Please report it there:
As I try to file a ticket, I realized that it was already reported by issue #2862 and turns out to be a subset of the problem of issue#2208 https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2208
There is a new PR on the Openstreetmap-carto Github page which would switch this style to water polygons instead of land polygons.
However, some users reported problems with the simplified water polygon shapefiles when this change was attempted in 2016. We believe the problem is no longer present, because the German map style is using these shapefiles without problems, but it needs testing. If you were one of the affected users, please try out the change on your server.
The branch is available at:
https://github.com/jeisenbe/openstreetmap-carto/tree/ocean-polygons
New PR:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3694
Old issue:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2101
New release (v4.21.0) is out and waits for deployment, read about the changes here:
New release is on hold, since it contains regressions, wait for v4.21.1:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3736
OpenStreetMap Carto release v4.22.0 is available for more than a week already:
OpenStreetMap Carto release v4.23.0 is out, but the deployment has not yet started:
OpenStreetMap Carto release v4.24.1 is being deployed - basically v4.24.0, but without water color change:
New release (v4.25.0) is out, but not yet deployed:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/releases/tag/v4.25.0
Kocio, is it ok to drop an issue here? In the Netherlands we are dealing with mtb trails which are only accessible for mtb bikes (often with a permit), but are tagged with bicycle=designated and highway=path. They render on osm (and also on my OFM) as regular bike paths (blue dotted lines) but are totally different. Question is, can Osm carto make a difference here and how?
Edit:
Question moved to https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=777684#p777684
I think the best place to discuss such specific problem is to open ticket on GitHub:
Ok, I’ll better start a new topic. I rather will not drop an issue if it is a mappers problem. I would like to know first if and how osm carto makes a difference between those paths before complaining it is a fault of the renderer.
OSM Carto 5.0.0 has been recently released and is being deployed on OSMF servers:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#v500—2020-03-18
OSM Carto 5.1.0 has been released yestarday and is being deployed on OSMF servers:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#v510—2020-04-10
Version 5.2.0 is out and deployment has been already started:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#v520—2020-05-8
Hey!
I have a question regarding Carto. Does anyone know how to export a map as a picture? Can’t make it work.
Do you know the features listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Export ?
Please tell us what worked for you, and what solution failed and why.
New version (5.3.1) is already deployed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pnorman/diary/395608
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pnorman/diary/395675
The only visual changes are for mini-roundabouts (rendered like a turning circle) and amenity=embassy is no longer rendered (office=diplomatic with diplomatic=embassy or diplomatic=consulate is visible instead with new icons).
really? This is a change in paradigm, isn’t it? OpenStreetMap carto used to give precedence to the established tagging methods, and amenity=embassy still has 4690 uses https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=embassy
while diplomatic=embassy has only slightly more with 6216 uses
I was discussing the ticket and on the list and nobody complained:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/4168
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2020-July/085115.html