Hi
following wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-2:HU Budapest has the same functional level as the 19 counties (AL6)
therefore from my point of view AL6 would be better for Budapest instead of AL8.
Any comments?
walter/Germany
Hi
following wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-2:HU Budapest has the same functional level as the 19 counties (AL6)
therefore from my point of view AL6 would be better for Budapest instead of AL8.
Any comments?
walter/Germany
Thank you for checking Hungarian admin_level polygons
therefore from my point of view AL6 would be better for Budapest instead of AL8.
As I now we have 2 “Budapest” admin - polygons
https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search.php?q=budapest&polygon_geojson=1&viewbox=
my personal opinion: I don’t support for removing - admin_level=8 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1244004
because - for the data consumers - there will be a “hole” in the map.
following wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-2:HU
be careful with Wikipedia info,
in Hungary - some NUTS was modified on 1 January 2018 ( http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/background )
Hungarian official info: https://www.ksh.hu/regional_atlas_counties?lang=en
So → “* Based on the changes, Budapest and Pest county are also planning and statistical regions, while Central Hungary became exclusively a statistical large region”* → admin_level=5