I don’t believe there could be a place to make sure everything gets rendered the way you suppose it to be. But there are places that could be used to make it more clear:
rendering proposition section on wiki
this forum (for general or cross-style problems)
bug trackers for each style (for more detailed things)
When somebody comes to osm-carto tracker and proposes things we’re not sure about tagging, we send people to the Tagging list, but every tag can be debatable. If you want to talk about meaning of covered=*, I use the similarity with tunnels and examples where it makes sense:
The biggest changes are changing gastronomy objects color to orange and changing farmland and societal amenities colors. The changes are still waiting for OSM.org deployment.
On the iD-Editor changelog list I noticed links to the involved pull requests for a lot of new added features.
Example: Add preset for sport=badminton (#5233, thanks @rene78)
Is this something you could also do for carto changelog page? Or does this need to much time to add?
It is something I thought of and it’s perfectly doable, but it makes release more tedious and error prone. It would need somebody willing to do this work. Would you like to join?
I try to focus on merging stuff and occasionally releases. The only way to make more than currently is via teamwork.
Hi
I have mapped boundary relations for State Forests e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8325800 and the adjacent National Park boundary.
However the State Forest boundary becomes indistinguishable when the wooded areas, which normally extend beyond the SF boundary, are also mapped.
National Park boundaries are still visible when wooded areas are mapped across the their boundary.
Is the rendering of protected areas yet to be resolved so that, for example, state forests boundaries are still visible like the national park boundaries?
If this is the relevant discussion, is it close to being resolved? https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/603
Edit: I have now read all the discussion in the link and see steady progress is continuing toward a good outcome soon.
I still plan to start rendering them. It just took some time to make research which proved that there’s no clear mapping between them and natural reserves, so they can’t be be unified, and after that there were a lot of other, more clear issues.
If you could do something with coding or testing, it would help a lot.