Well that is a start but you have not changed your profile “to exactly match the wording used on the Canadian Tagging Guideline” You picked out one sentence out of
“A highway=track is roads for agricultural use, gravel roads in the forest etc.; usually unpaved/unsealed but may occasionally apply to paved tracks as well. If a track is used for recreational purposes, it should be tagged as leisure=track.
Example: Small roads in parks, dirt trails in fields, etc. Speed limits are probably 30 km/h or less; roads may be maintained privately.
Recommendation: The easiest way to remember this one is for a tractor, as it would have 2 ruts, where a tractor would be able to use it, or an ATV/Horseback/mountain bike/hiking would be able to use these roads.”
Your definition would not include paved tracks for example. It would not include the small roads in parks specifically mentioned. A large percent of these roads were tagged as secondary highways, and the offshoot skidder trails were marked as good roads. I don’t know if that was your work but it clearly does not describe roads that a barely fit to drive a vehicle on.
The suggestion I placed above would keep tracks to 1 lane forest roads. They would be bumped up to residential or unclassified if they are two lanes and show signs of some maintenance (a good sign would be having a few cabins built on them). All forest resource roads have a constructed foundation. They were designed and built by the forestry or mining industries to support huge vehicles and transport trucks needed. The question is have they been maintained since or are they abandoned and degrading over time.