I agree, that recycling centers should be tagged as “landuse” (if they are not buildings of some kind).
Have you considered adding a suggestion for this?
The reason is in end consumers of these amenities. Amenity is a useful feature for ordinary people, who can use the amenity directly. To my mind, it is the main point here.
People use waste baskets, recycling containers directly, interact with them, that’s why we can call them and tag them as amenities.
And we don’t use recycling centers directly, they are for industrial purpose.
Not around here. We have recycling containers for bottles, clothes and batteries. But for electronics, building material from renovation, large paper cartons, hazardous waste, garden waste, etc. I go to a recycling center.
Do you really think that all changes are monitored in such detail, that people will complain about it ?
Read the wiki, commercial is wrong for recycle centers. If any landuse has to be assigned, industrial comes the closest. I only suggested retail because you were referring to the money taking part. But no reason to map it as retail actually
Now I have to start searching for your changelist and make a changelist comment.:rolleyes: