You are not logged in.

#1 2017-08-25 12:51:24

Władysław Komorek
Member
From: Kraków, Poland
Registered: 2012-06-30
Posts: 1,726
Website

Borders

Ways that represent administrative boundaries (relations) should not be shared with the ways that represent the river, landuse, leisure, etc.

Keep in mind that, in the future, when we will have aerial photographs of higher resolution, it will be necessary to improve the ways of the above entities, each independently.

Currently, in order to correct it, just make parralel copies of ways and tag each of them respectively. (Shift+P in JOSM)

As an example, the Lalitpur District relation (4583253) with its subareas subordinate may serve to find these errors:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4583253 Relation: Lalitpur(4583253)

Offline

#2 2017-09-15 12:11:02

marek kleciak
Member
Registered: 2010-10-11
Posts: 8,439

Re: Borders

Hi folks, our friend WojtekK find out, that admin_level 5 borders of Nepal are open data. So we can imort it into the OSM. Speak something against it?

Best regards,
Marek

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB