You are not logged in.

Announcement

*** NOTICE: forum.openstreetmap.org is being retired. Please request a category for your community in the new ones as soon as possible using this process, which will allow you to propose your community moderators.
Please create new topics on the new site at community.openstreetmap.org. We expect the migration of data will take a few weeks, you can follow its progress here.***

Pages: 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 36

#151 2015-03-17 10:40:34

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Moin,

Hier stehen die Ergebnisse der letzten globalen Auswertung. Datenstand ist heute 0:53

 country | missing | added 
---------+---------+-------
 ARG     |       1 |    14
 AUS     |       1 |      
 BEL     |         |     3
 BGD     |         |     4
 BRA     |       1 |    10
 CAN     |       1 |      
 CHL     |         |     1
 CHN     |         |    16
 DEU     |         |    10
 ETH     |       2 |      
 GBR     |         |    67
 IDN     |         |     1
 IRL     |       4 |    80
 ITA     |       5 |    11
 JPN     |         |     5
 KOR     |         |     1
 LTU     |         |     1
 MAR     |         |     2
 NOR     |         |     4
 PER     |         |     2
 PHL     |       2 |     3
 RUS     |         |     3
 SDN     |         |     5
 SSD     |       1 |      
 TUR     |       9 |    16
 UKR     |         |     5
 USA     |       1 |     3
(27 Zeilen)

Weltweit scheinen die Landesgrenzen ok zu sein.

Gruss
walter

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#152 2015-03-18 01:07:01

4rch
Member
Registered: 2013-06-20
Posts: 661

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

ok, I've improved the boundaries between Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia. Pedra Branca belongs to Singapore now (in OSM) according to ICJ ruling. I hope that everything worked fine.

Last edited by 4rch (2015-03-18 01:16:24)

Offline

#153 2015-03-18 07:04:08

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Moin,

Hier stehen die Ergebnisse der letzten globalen Auswertung. Datenstand ist heute 0:18

  country | missing | added 
---------+---------+-------
 ARG     |         |    28
 AUS     |         |     1
 BEL     |         |     4
 BRA     |       1 |    10
 CAN     |         |     1
 DEU     |         |     1
 ESP     |         |     1
 ETH     |         |     2
 GBR     |         |    32
 IDN     |         |     6
 IRL     |         |    76
 JPN     |         |     9
 LTU     |         |     1
 MEX     |         |    24
 PHL     |         |     2
 RUS     |       7 |    10
 SDN     |         |     3
 SSD     |         |     1
 STP     |         |     1
 TUR     |         |    12
 UKR     |         |     3
 USA     |       2 |     4
(22 Zeilen)

Weltweit scheinen die Landesgrenzen ok zu sein.

Gruss
walter

@4rch: deine Änderungen bei Singapur sind in meiner Boundaries-Map noch nicht zu sehen, da du sie "etwas zu spät" gemacht hast und der Job schon aktiv war. Morgen sollte aber was zu erkennen sein.

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#154 2015-03-18 07:55:24

kingrollo
Member
Registered: 2015-03-13
Posts: 9

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

4rch wrote:

I've produced a mockup with some hypothetical boundaries based on the equidistance principle under the assumption that South Ledge belongs to Malaysia as this low-tide elevation lies within Malaysian territorial waters according to my calculations.

Hi 4rch,

Thanks for your research on this, and apologies for taking a couple of days to get back to you... It seems the issue of Pedra Branca is more complex than I'd realised!

I found this map helpful: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … ca_Map.svg. Based on that, I think your sketch should be correct, except for South Ledge, although if "it belongs to the state in the territorial waters of which it is located" (again, from the Wikipedia page) then it shouldn't logically be a concern.

The Joint Technical Committee seems to be taking its sweet time: https://books.google.com/books?id=ES9JB … ca&f=false (this also claims Pedra Branca is not an island by the habitability definition, although Singapore seems to be claiming it is).

The lack of full agreement with Indonesia doesn't help, although I haven't actually seen any evidence of an Indonesian claim on the islands, so it may not be an issue. This is probably illuminating, if you have the patience to read it: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/130/14492.pdf

The other dispute in the Tuas area (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia% … ation_case) is tricky too. Presumably the "Point 20 sliver" ought to be marked as disputed in OSM? Is there a protocol for this, or do we just ignore it?

Thanks again for your help!
Roland.

Offline

#155 2015-03-18 11:19:04

4rch
Member
Registered: 2013-06-20
Posts: 661

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

kingrollo wrote:

I found this map helpful: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … ca_Map.svg. Based on that, I think your sketch should be correct, except for South Ledge, although if "it belongs to the state in the territorial waters of which it is located" (again, from the Wikipedia page) then it shouldn't logically be a concern.

Hello, Low-tide elevations have an impact on the territorial sea boundaries, so I took South Ledge also into account.
UNCLOS Part II Article 13:

Where a low-tide elevation is situated wholly or partly at a distance not exceeding the breadth of the territorial sea from the mainland or an island, the low-water line on that elevation may be used as the baseline for measuring the breadth of the territorial sea.

I've retrieved the coordinates of South Ledge from NGA GEOnet Names Server and then I've compared it with some other maps. The position in OSM should be ok. I guess the location in the map you've mentioned is incorrect.

RevisedmapshowinglocationofPedraBranca%28SingaporeMemorial%29.jpg

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/61500.pdf (page 7)

kingrollo wrote:

The other dispute in the Tuas area (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia% … ation_case) is tricky too. Presumably the "Point 20 sliver" ought to be marked as disputed in OSM? Is there a protocol for this, or do we just ignore it?

I'll take a closer look at it. Maybe we should tag the affected boundary ways with disputed=yes
Malaysia/Singapore have already agreed upon the following part of the boundary: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333364480

Last edited by 4rch (2015-03-19 02:21:54)

Offline

#156 2015-03-19 10:03:41

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Moin,

Hier stehen die Ergebnisse der letzten globalen Auswertung. Datenstand ist heute 0:17

 country | missing | added 
---------+---------+-------
 ARG     |         |    16
 AUS     |       4 |      
 BEL     |       4 |     1
 BGD     |         |     4
 BGR     |         |     2
 BLR     |         |     1
 BRA     |       2 |    13
 CHN     |       1 |     5
 ESP     |       3 |     2
 FRA     |       2 |      
 GBR     |         |     6
 IDN     |       5 |    14
 IND     |       1 |      
 IRL     |         |    64
 JPN     |       1 |     3
 MEX     |         |     1
 PHL     |         |     1
 POL     |         |     1
 RUS     |         |     8
 TUR     |         |     1
 UKR     |         |    13
 USA     |         |     2
 VEN     |         |     1
(23 Zeilen)

Weltweit scheinen die Landesgrenzen ok zu sein.

Hier mal die Lage bei Singapur, wie sie sich jetzt in OSM darstellt: (New situation at the Singapur area)
tn_pedra_branca.png
Da die alten Grenzen noch durchschimmern, kann man die Änderungen leicht erkennen.

Überblick: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/boundari … 121_304751

@4rch: im Westen hat sich ja auch einiges verschoben. War das deine Arbeit?

Gruss
walter

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#157 2015-03-19 10:56:13

4rch
Member
Registered: 2013-06-20
Posts: 661

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

wambacher wrote:

@4rch: im Westen hat sich ja auch einiges verschoben. War das deine Arbeit?

Yes, I've modified the boundary there based on the equidistance principle.

kingrollo wrote:

The other dispute in the Tuas area (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia% … ation_case) is tricky too. Presumably the "Point 20 sliver" ought to be marked as disputed in OSM? Is there a protocol for this, or do we just ignore it?

I took a closer look at Malaysia's claim in the area. I've visualized its claim (coordinates retrieved from Wikipedia): http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/mal … laim_33520

The claimed line of Malaysia intersects the archipelagic baseline of Indonesia and covers some landarea of Singapore. It seems unclear to me how they retrieved this line. Point 17 for example is closer to Indonesia than to Malaysia. In my opinion we should use the well established equidistance principle, which is quiet fair as it doesn't give an advantage to any state, instead of unfunded claims. (I've already uploaded the boundary line based on the equidistance principle yesterday)

Offline

#158 2015-03-20 11:46:32

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Moin,

Hier stehen die Ergebnisse der letzten globalen Auswertung. Datenstand ist heute 0:17

 country | missing | added 
---------+---------+-------
 ARG     |         |    27
 AUS     |         |     4
 BEL     |         |     4
 BRA     |       2 |     3
 CHN     |       1 |     3
 DEU     |       1 |     3
 DZA     |       2 |      
 ESP     |         |     3
 FRA     |       2 |     2
 GBR     |       2 |    37
 GTM     |       2 |      
 IRL     |       2 |    30
 ITA     |         |     5
 JPN     |       1 |     5
 RUS     |         |     1
 SVK     |       4 |      
 TUR     |         |     1
 UKR     |         |     1

Weltweit scheinen die Landesgrenzen ok zu sein.

Gruss
walter

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#159 2015-03-20 23:19:37

kingrollo
Member
Registered: 2015-03-13
Posts: 9

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

4rch wrote:
wambacher wrote:

@4rch: im Westen hat sich ja auch einiges verschoben. War das deine Arbeit?

Yes, I've modified the boundary there based on the equidistance principle.

kingrollo wrote:

The other dispute in the Tuas area (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia% … ation_case) is tricky too. Presumably the "Point 20 sliver" ought to be marked as disputed in OSM? Is there a protocol for this, or do we just ignore it?

I took a closer look at Malaysia's claim in the area. I've visualized its claim (coordinates retrieved from Wikipedia): http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/mal … laim_33520

The claimed line of Malaysia intersects the archipelagic baseline of Indonesia and covers some landarea of Singapore. It seems unclear to me how they retrieved this line. Point 17 for example is closer to Indonesia than to Malaysia. In my opinion we should use the well established equidistance principle, which is quiet fair as it doesn't give an advantage to any state, instead of unfunded claims. (I've already uploaded the boundary line based on the equidistance principle yesterday)

Thanks for your edits on the other areas! Looks good to me! I think you're right about the South Ledge location - apologies for the Wikipedia link! smile

With regards to your Tuas map here: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/mal … 9/103.6177

It's worth being a little bit careful around here, as the area has been subject to a lot of reclamation in the last few decades. According to my records, the area you've marked as being on Singaporean land was reclaimed some time after 1990 (probably closer to 2000). I'm guessing the equidistance principle refers to the original island boundary?

I can't see a good historic map of Singapore online (the 1842 McCallum map is rather nice) but this gives you an idea of what it started out looking like:
Singapore_map_1942.jpg

There's also this one from 1994, which I've just noticed also shows the "agreed-upon maritime boundary", although without a source.

Offline

#160 2015-03-21 10:07:44

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Moin,

Hier stehen die Ergebnisse der letzten globalen Auswertung. Datenstand ist heute 0:28

 country | missing | added 
---------+---------+-------
 BEL     |         |     1
 CMR     |       6 |      
 DEU     |         |     1
 FRA     |       2 |     2
 GBR     |         |     4
 IND     |         |     1
 IRL     |       3 |    70
 JPN     |         |     5
 NPL     |         |    14
 POL     |         |     6
 RUS     |       8 |     4
 SDN     |         |     2
 UKR     |         |     5
 USA     |       2 |     1
(14 Zeilen)

Weltweit scheinen die Landesgrenzen ok zu sein.

Gruss
walter

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#161 2015-03-22 00:28:48

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Tja, unsere Amis. So sehen bei denen die Administrativen Grenzen aus - hier mal westlich von Jackson/Missisippi
tn_funny_america.png
Hier werden in Josm nur die boundary=adminitrative angezeigt. Mehrere Imports übereinander geklatscht, AL4, AL6 und AL8 kreuz und quer übereinander, sogar Stadtgrenzen benachbarter Städte (al8) sind doppelt aber nicht deckungsgleich.

da helfen auch keine "Missing Boundaries" mehr sad

Gute Nacht
walter

Last edited by wambacher (2015-03-22 01:20:07)

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#162 2015-03-22 09:35:55

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Moin,

Hier stehen die Ergebnisse der letzten globalen Auswertung. Datenstand ist heute 1:25

 country | missing | added 
---------+---------+-------
 ARG     |         |     3
 AUS     |       2 |      
 BEL     |         |     1
 BRA     |       7 |      
 CMR     |         |     6
 ESP     |         |     3
 FRA     |         |     2
 IRL     |       1 |    43
 LTU     |         |     1
 MEX     |         |     1
 NOR     |       2 |      
 NPL     |         |     4
 PHL     |       7 |      
 POL     |       2 |      
 RUS     |         |    13
 UKR     |         |     7
 USA     |       1 |     3
         |       1 |      
(18 Zeilen)

Weltweit scheinen die Landesgrenzen ok zu sein.

Gruss
walter

Last edited by wambacher (2015-03-22 09:36:31)

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#163 2015-03-23 08:32:25

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Moin,

Hier stehen die Ergebnisse der letzten globalen Auswertung. Datenstand ist heute 0:33

 country | missing | added 
---------+---------+-------
 ARG     |       4 |     1
 BEL     |         |     2
 BGR     |       3 |      
 BOL     |         |     1
 CAN     |         |     1
 CHN     |         |     1
 DEU     |         |    12
 ESP     |         |     1
 GBR     |         |    26
 GRC     |       2 |      
 IRL     |       1 |    67
 JPN     |         |    42
 MEX     |         |     1
 NOR     |         |     2
 NPL     |       4 |     7
 PHL     |       1 |      
 POL     |         |     1
 RUS     |         |     2
 UKR     |         |     5
(19 Zeilen)

Weltweit scheinen die Landesgrenzen ok zu sein.

Gruss
walter

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#164 2015-03-23 16:06:58

4rch
Member
Registered: 2013-06-20
Posts: 661

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

kingrollo wrote:

With regards to your Tuas map here: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/mal … 9/103.6177

It's worth being a little bit careful around here, as the area has been subject to a lot of reclamation in the last few decades. According to my records, the area you've marked as being on Singaporean land was reclaimed some time after 1990 (probably closer to 2000). I'm guessing the equidistance principle refers to the original island boundary?

Yes, you're right, there may be historic titles. I've removed the boundary which I had drawn based on the equidistance principle measured from the actual coastline. I've added a straight line between Point 1C (Boundary Agreement Singapore - Indonesia) and Point W25 (Boundary Agreement Singapore - Malaysia) now. This seems like a good solution to me as we can only make estimations in this area because there may be a historic title.
I've produced a map which shows the actual agreements (green) and the equidistant median line I've calculated based on the map of 1942 you've mentioned: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/mal … laim_33520

Last edited by 4rch (2015-03-23 21:12:27)

Offline

#165 2015-03-24 06:01:13

kingrollo
Member
Registered: 2015-03-13
Posts: 9

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Yes, looks good to me. That equidistant boundary is really interesting - obviously things have got very complicated at some point!

Thanks again for your work here! smile

Offline

#166 2015-03-24 07:33:46

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Moin,

Hier stehen die Ergebnisse der letzten globalen Auswertung. Datenstand ist heute 0:23

 country | missing | added 
---------+---------+-------
 ARG     |         |     1
 AUS     |         |     2
 BEL     |       1 |    15
 BGD     |         |     3
 BRA     |       8 |     8
 DEU     |     251 |    60
 ESP     |         |    10
 GBR     |         |    55
 IRL     |         |    66
 MEX     |         |     5
 PER     |       6 |      
 PHL     |         |     1
 PRT     |         |     1
 RUS     |         |     1
 SDN     |         |     2
 TUR     |         |     3
 UKR     |         |    12
 USA     |       2 |      
(18 Zeilen)

Mal wieder "Putzarbeiten" in DEU. Alle Deletes betreffen wohl Gemarkungen mit AL11.

Naja, dieser CS-Kommentar deutet ja einiges an: "katastergrenzen entfern, NICHT stadtbezirke, NICHT stadteile, NICH postleitzahlen. vorbereitung zur wiederherstelllung von version 1".

Wenn ich so "meine" Grenzen erfassen würde (reinhauen, löschen, neue Version, löschen, ...), käme ich mir echt komisch vor. Zudem würden so alle Änderungen gelöscht, die andere Mapper eventuell schon gemacht habe.

Die 60 Neuzugänge sind wohl AL10, die ein anderer Mapper in Sachsen-Anhalt eingegeben hat.

Weltweit scheinen die Landesgrenzen ok zu sein.

Gruss
walter

Last edited by wambacher (2015-03-24 07:51:16)

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#167 2015-03-25 08:40:21

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Moin,

Hier stehen die Ergebnisse der letzten globalen Auswertung. Datenstand ist heute 0:23

 country | missing | added 
---------+---------+-------
 BEL     |         |     7
 BGR     |       3 |      
 BRA     |       4 |     3
 COL     |       2 |      
 DEU     |         |    21
 FRA     |       2 |      
 GBR     |         |    10
 IRL     |         |    69
 JPN     |         |     9
 PER     |       2 |      
 POL     |         |     9
 RUS     |       1 |    21
 UKR     |       1 |    29
 USA     |       3 |     2
(14 Zeilen)

Weltweit scheinen die Landesgrenzen ok zu sein.

Gruss
walter

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#168 2015-03-26 00:30:28

4rch
Member
Registered: 2013-06-20
Posts: 661

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Falls jemand Langeweile haben sollte, hier sind noch einige offene Bugs vom 22.3.: http://osm.wno-edv-service.de:82/index. … cle&id=135
Mir reichts nach geschätzten 30 reparierten Grenzen jetzt erstmal wieder...

Offline

#169 2015-03-26 00:38:50

Man77
Member
Registered: 2015-01-28
Posts: 5

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Ich hoff, ich bin hier nicht ganz falsch wink

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass in OSM die alte Grenzziehung der Distrikte Sarpang (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3899615) und Dagana (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3899605) in Bhutan noch fortbesteht. Was früher Sarpangs äußerster Südwesten war, ist jetzt Daganas Süden: vgl. http://www.nsb.gov.bt/map/main/gewog.php oder http://www.nsb.gov.bt/GIS/map/DAGANA/DA … CATION.pdf

Wer super, wenn das jemand aktualisieren könnte. lg!

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Man77

Offline

#170 2015-03-26 01:04:46

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Man77 wrote:

Ich hoff, ich bin hier nicht ganz falsch wink

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass in OSM die alte Grenzziehung der Distrikte Sarpang (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3899615) und Dagana (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3899605) in Bhutan noch fortbesteht. Was früher Sarpangs äußerster Südwesten war, ist jetzt Daganas Süden: vgl. http://www.nsb.gov.bt/map/main/gewog.php oder http://www.nsb.gov.bt/GIS/map/DAGANA/DA … CATION.pdf

Wer super, wenn das jemand aktualisieren könnte. lg!

Hi,

jo, hier bist du genau an der richtigen Stelle! Ich schaue mir das mal an und wenn alles ok ist, wird das geändert werden. Die heutige Auswertung läuft schon, also wirst du die Änderungen frühestens am 27.3. morgens in meiner Boundaries-Map sehen können.

Gruss
walter

Last edited by wambacher (2015-03-26 01:29:01)

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#171 2015-03-26 07:36:57

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

4rch wrote:

Falls jemand Langeweile haben sollte, hier sind noch einige offene Bugs vom 22.3.: http://osm.wno-edv-service.de:82/index. … cle&id=135
Mir reichts nach geschätzten 30 reparierten Grenzen jetzt erstmal wieder...

Oops, hab ich glatt übersehen. Normalerweise mach ich kurz vor Start die nächsten Auswertung den "Final Polish", muß das aber verschwitzt haben.
Ich "husch" gleich mal drüber.

Gruss
walter

EDIT: Done

Last edited by wambacher (2015-03-26 08:19:27)

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#172 2015-03-26 07:39:32

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Moin,

Hier stehen die Ergebnisse der letzten globalen Auswertung. Datenstand ist heute 0:14

 country | missing | added 
---------+---------+-------
 BEL     |         |     7
 BGR     |         |     3
 BLR     |       3 |      
 BOL     |       2 |     1
 BRA     |       4 |    13
 CAN     |       2 |      
 CHN     |         |     1
 COL     |         |     2
 DEU     |       2 |    34
 DZA     |         |     2
 ESP     |         |     2
 FRA     |         |     2
 GBR     |         |    19
 GRC     |         |     2
 GTM     |         |     2
 HUN     |       3 |      
 IDN     |         |     6
 IRL     |         |    64
 MEX     |         |     1
 PER     |         |     2
 POL     |         |    14
 RUS     |       1 |    10
 SVK     |         |     4
 TON     |         |     3
 UKR     |         |     5
 USA     |       5 |     3

Weltweit scheinen die Landesgrenzen ok zu sein.

Gruss
walter

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#173 2015-03-26 10:59:27

Man77
Member
Registered: 2015-01-28
Posts: 5

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

@Wambacher: Besten Dank!

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Man77

Offline

#174 2015-03-27 12:14:43

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Moin,

Hier stehen die Ergebnisse der letzten globalen Auswertung. Datenstand ist heute 0:22

 country | missing | added 
---------+---------+-------
 ARG     |       3 |     1
 BGD     |         |     2
 BGR     |       1 |     3
 BOL     |       1 |     3
 BRA     |       4 |    23
 CAN     |         |     2
 DEU     |         |     3
 DZA     |         |     4
 ESP     |         |     1
 GBR     |         |    36
 HUN     |         |     2
 IRL     |         |    51
 JPN     |         |     5
 KOR     |       1 |      
 MAR     |       8 |     2
 MEX     |         |     1
 NPL     |         |     4
 POL     |         |     1
 PSE     |         |     4
 RUS     |         |     7
 UKR     |         |    13
 USA     |         |     2
(22 Zeilen)

Weltweit scheinen die Landesgrenzen ok zu sein.

Gruss
walter

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

#175 2015-03-27 12:54:06

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Internationale Admin-Grenzen 2015

Man77 wrote:

Wer super, wenn das jemand aktualisieren könnte. lg!

Bittschön:

tn_bhutan.png

https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/boundari … 05_3899615

Gruss
walter

Osm Software Watchlist  Osm Emergency Map
Osm Healthcare Map

Offline

Pages: 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 36

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB