You are not logged in.

Announcement

*** NOTICE: forum.openstreetmap.org is being retired. Please request a category for your community in the new ones as soon as possible using this process, which will allow you to propose your community moderators.
Please create new topics on the new site at community.openstreetmap.org. We expect the migration of data will take a few weeks, you can follow its progress here.***

#1 2013-07-03 11:32:40

reneman
Member
From: Mainz
Registered: 2012-10-13
Posts: 1,106
Website

Proposed features/reference_point - Voting

Allg. Information:

Hier gibt es eine Abstimmung:
http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Proposed_featu … ence_point

 reference_point=yes  

Le 03/07/2013 05:46, Felix Delattre a écrit :

    Dear community,

    please vote for this feature proposal:
    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pro … ence_point

    This is needed to get proper route-planning working in all Central
    American countries.

    Thank you for all the feedback given and special thanks to Brycenesbitt
    [1] for reviewing the English language and cleaning up the proposal to
    provide only concrete, understandable and necessary information.

    If you wish you can have a look into prior communication logs:
    Initial conversation:
    http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermai … 09613.html
    Request for comments:
    http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermai … 13791.html

    Cheers,
    Felix

Sorry, I add not followed the discussion in the past.

In my point of view, before creating a new key, we must see if no available key is suitable.
It is easier to develop the use of existing, and well established, keys, by adding a new value, than creating a new key for just one specific use.
Each time we create a new key, we must adapt the tools to take it in account especially osm2psql must be adapted to create one column more the the tables.
Creating a new key is heavier than creating a new value.

And there is an existing key that seems to be suitable, with a new value : place=reference_point
The "place" key is already taken in account by a lot of tools, it is already widely used.

And the object to be tagged as place=reference_point could be a church, a gas station in a cross, a particular house, a tree...

I know several places in France where this kind of "natural" or descriptive routing would apply, e.g. :
"Prendre la route après la pharmacie puis le chemin à droite à la Maison Verte" (take the road after the pharmacy and then the path at right hand at the Green House" in a village where I lived in Provence
The house was no more green for long, but white. And there is now no more house but ruins. But we still say "La Maison Verte".
I would have tagged it with a "place" key, first as isolated_dwelling, and latter as location, and in fact "place=reference_point" would fit...
--
FrViPofm

Gruß


» Check the Monuments! «
Viele der als historic=monument erfassten Objekte sind in Wirklichkeit kein Monument. Sie wurden mangels passender Tags oder aus Unkenntnis als Monument erfaßt. Diese Karte CheckTheMonuments will bei der Korrektur unterstützen.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB