You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Announcement
Please create new topics on the new site at community.openstreetmap.org. We expect the migration of data will take a few weeks, you can follow its progress here.***
Pages: 1
#1 2009-08-15 13:25:29
- jcjefferies
- Member
- Registered: 2009-02-15
- Posts: 6
Underground Stream
Part of a stream which was presumably copied from an out of copyright map is now underground. Earlier in the year I changed the settings on the underground portion to :-
"layer = -1" and
"tunnel = yes".
Afterwards I am sure that the underground portion was displayed differently on the map, possibly as a dotted line. However I have noticed that although the properties are still the same the underground part is now displayed the same as the open part of the stream. Am I using the correct setting to indicate an underground stream?
Chris
Offline
#2 2009-08-15 15:19:56
- SK53
- Member
- Registered: 2009-01-11
- Posts: 705
Re: Underground Stream
This looks right. I have a similar case locally which renders OK (in this case the river was culverted under the road):
Offline
#3 2009-08-15 16:50:36
- DaveF
- Member
- Registered: 2009-07-03
- Posts: 47
Re: Underground Stream
Part of a stream which was presumably copied from an out of copyright map is now underground. Earlier in the year I changed the settings on the underground portion to :-
"layer = -1" and
"tunnel = yes".Afterwards I am sure that the underground portion was displayed differently on the map, possibly as a dotted line. However I have noticed that although the properties are still the same the underground part is now displayed the same as the open part of the stream. Am I using the correct setting to indicate an underground stream?
Chris
Hi
I haven't tried it with waterways but does it need a layer tag? The railways I've used it on automatically sorted itself out.
The only time I think I've needed layer is where I had 3 different railway lines crossing each other a different levels.
Dave F.
Offline
Pages: 1