talkat
June 7, 2011, 6:25am
25
Sure, but how would the forest relation know how to connect them?
You’d need a relation to contain each of these more-than-2000-nodes-areas and add this relation to the forest’s relation (and not the individual ways that are part of the “smaller” relation)
talkat.
dimka
June 7, 2011, 6:52am
26
talkat:
Sure, but how would the forest relation know how to connect them?
You’d need a relation to contain each of these more-than-2000-nodes-areas and add this relation to the forest’s relation (and not the individual ways that are part of the “smaller” relation)
talkat.
I believe this is no problem - look here at Figure 6.
talkat
June 7, 2011, 9:52am
27
Ok, go for it.
Hopefully this is supported in all the popular renderers (mapnik, osmarender, mkgmap, osm2gpsmid, etc.)
talkat.
dimka
June 7, 2011, 10:11am
28
talkat:
Hopefully this is supported in all the popular renderers (mapnik, osmarender, mkgmap, osm2gpsmid, etc.)
talkat.
I understand your concern. To be sure, I will take one such relation in OSM format and try to produce a mapnik/osmarender image as well as a Garmin map (unfortunately I don’t have experience with osm2gpsmid).
talkat
June 7, 2011, 10:59am
29
I can test osm2gpsmid.
But if all other renderers work (and osm2gpsmid doesn’t) - then it’s good enough for me (if my vote counts, that is…)
talkat.
dimka
June 7, 2011, 7:48pm
30
I’ve checked mapnik, osmarender (new version, orp.pl) and mkgmap - all of them render the multipolygons with untagged+splitted ways just fine.
I will be therefore proceeding with the import on the live database soon.
talkat
June 7, 2011, 8:25pm
31
dimka:
I’ve checked mapnik, osmarender (new version, orp.pl) and mkgmap - all of them render the multipolygons with untagged+splitted ways just fine.
I will be therefore proceeding with the import on the live database soon.
Cheers!
Hope the import will be smooth.
I’ll create a list in the wiki with all forests, like the places and municipalities.
Maybe we could have a list of non-KKL forests as well?
So we could see whether we’d like to keep them or not, and if we want to keep them - to tag them accordingly.
talkat.
dimka
June 11, 2011, 12:47pm
32
One last test before the actual upload was successful.
You can review all the data via
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11130
Do you want to run some tests (scripts etc.) on the test database before the actual upload?
dimka
talkat
June 11, 2011, 4:01pm
33
As much as I could see (I only did a brief overview) - it looks good! Great job!
I wonder if we could somehow automate all the inner ways.
e.g. this water.
talkat.
adrukh
June 13, 2011, 6:19am
34
I see changes by kkl_import!
Let us know when we can start tidying up.
talkat
June 13, 2011, 6:47am
35
Should we decide about tagging non-kkl forests?
Or should future updates just update kkl-managed forests?
talkat.
dimka
June 13, 2011, 7:36am
36
There are some problems with the import - duplicates. I am looking into it.
dimka
June 13, 2011, 7:53am
37
Please do not change the objects uploaded by kkl_import. I will try to revert the changes.
dimka
June 13, 2011, 9:19am
38
Something went wrong with the import script, which caused the duplicate ways.
As far as I understand, there are no duplicate nodes, can you confirm this? If so, recovery should be much easier.
talkat
June 13, 2011, 9:57am
39
dimka:
Something went wrong with the import script, which caused the duplicate ways.
As far as I understand, there are no duplicate nodes, can you confirm this? If so, recovery should be much easier.
Indeed, it seems to me that there are no duplicate nodes.
There are, however, duplicate ways, sometimes even 3 ways using the same nodes.
talkat.
dimka
June 13, 2011, 11:14am
40
I suspect that the university firewall somehow interferes with the upload.
I’ll continue from home, later.
dimka
dimka
June 13, 2011, 8:28pm
41
In the meantime, there will be a plenty (around 600,000) of “orphan” nodes around. Please try not to touch them!
dimka
June 15, 2011, 8:24pm
42
Update: I was able to revert the problematic ways and now continue to upload the rest of the stuff.
If all goes well, it will probably take another day or two.
dimka
adrukh
June 15, 2011, 9:52pm
43
I already “itch” when I see tagless areas on the map… Let us know
talkat
June 16, 2011, 4:13am
44
So far it looks good!
Here is a nice big chunk that is clearly more accurate than the current data we have.
talkat.