You are not logged in.

Announcement

*** NOTICE: forum.openstreetmap.org is being retired. Please request a category for your community in the new ones as soon as possible using this process, which will allow you to propose your community moderators.
Please create new topics on the new site at community.openstreetmap.org. We expect the migration of data will take a few weeks, you can follow its progress here.***

#1 2008-11-21 00:02:03

Tox
Member
Registered: 2008-09-09
Posts: 18

Too much good?

I found this on a map to day http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.52 … rs=B000FTF Namely the short streets next Herrenbergerstraße. They are ment to symbolize single parking spaces parallel to the street. It looks strange on the renderer (yes i know this should be no argument) and I belive a tag could store that information way better. Are there proposals for tags which indicate it and when and how long and how expensive parking is allowed, and how the parking spaces are orientated relative to the street?

Offline

#2 2008-11-21 00:31:20

Skywave
Member
Registered: 2007-11-13
Posts: 91

Re: Too much good?

Tox wrote:

I found this on a map to day http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.52 … rs=B000FTF Namely the short streets next Herrenbergerstraße. They are ment to symbolize single parking spaces parallel to the street. It looks strange on the renderer (yes i know this should be no argument) and I belive a tag could store that information way better. Are there proposals for tags which indicate it and when and how long and how expensive parking is allowed, and how the parking spaces are orientated relative to the street?

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag: … %3Dparking .
But there is not yet a proposal for the orientation, but i think that with a way tagged amenity=parking, people will get the point. But then you won't get a P symbol.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB