You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Announcement
Please create new topics on the new site at community.openstreetmap.org. We expect the migration of data will take a few weeks, you can follow its progress here.***
#1 2021-07-29 19:20:25
- Dave Magill
- New Member
- Registered: 2021-07-29
- Posts: 2
Best practice for combined amenities? (Police/Municipal Bldg)
I'm a new OSM editor. A town manager ( 'Borough' since it's Pennsylvania ) has asked if I could add a label 'Municipal Building' to the feature currently labeled Police Department. This situation must be very common in small cities/towns. What is best practice/advice for tagging and naming combined amenities in a single building?
TIA.
Offline
#2 2021-07-29 23:18:57
- maro21
- Member
- From: Wrocław
- Registered: 2018-03-06
- Posts: 1,114
Re: Best practice for combined amenities? (Police/Municipal Bldg)
I think the building should be tagged as building=civic and within its outline you can add amenities as points: amenity=police, office=government and other
Offline
#3 2021-07-30 02:18:04
- Kovoschiz
- Member
- Registered: 2019-10-06
- Posts: 128
Re: Best practice for combined amenities? (Police/Municipal Bldg)
On top of the above answer, what municipal service does it provide? You could consider `building=office` instead if it's mainly back-office with less public service.
The site (including carpark and everything around it in the lot) would be `landuse=institutional` (I don't like `landuse=civic_admin`).
Last edited by Kovoschiz (2021-07-30 02:18:17)
Offline
#4 2021-07-30 19:54:44
- Dave Magill
- New Member
- Registered: 2021-07-29
- Posts: 2
Re: Best practice for combined amenities? (Police/Municipal Bldg)
Thank you both for the advice.
-- Dave
Offline