You are not logged in.

Announcement

*** NOTICE: forum.openstreetmap.org is being retired. Please request a category for your community in the new ones as soon as possible using this process, which will allow you to propose your community moderators.
Please create new topics on the new site at community.openstreetmap.org. We expect the migration of data will take a few weeks, you can follow its progress here.***

#1 2021-07-29 19:20:25

Dave Magill
New Member
Registered: 2021-07-29
Posts: 2

Best practice for combined amenities? (Police/Municipal Bldg)

I'm a new OSM editor. A town manager ( 'Borough' since it's Pennsylvania ) has asked if I could add a label 'Municipal Building' to the feature currently labeled Police Department. This situation must be very common in small cities/towns. What is best practice/advice for tagging and naming combined amenities in a single building?
TIA.

Offline

#2 2021-07-29 23:18:57

maro21
Member
From: Wrocław
Registered: 2018-03-06
Posts: 1,114

Re: Best practice for combined amenities? (Police/Municipal Bldg)

I think the building should be tagged as building=civic and within its outline you can add amenities as points: amenity=police, office=government and other

Offline

#3 2021-07-30 02:18:04

Kovoschiz
Member
Registered: 2019-10-06
Posts: 128

Re: Best practice for combined amenities? (Police/Municipal Bldg)

On top of the above answer, what municipal service does it provide? You could consider `building=office` instead if it's mainly back-office with less public service.

The site (including carpark and everything around it in the lot) would be `landuse=institutional` (I don't like `landuse=civic_admin`).

Last edited by Kovoschiz (2021-07-30 02:18:17)

Offline

#4 2021-07-30 19:54:44

Dave Magill
New Member
Registered: 2021-07-29
Posts: 2

Re: Best practice for combined amenities? (Police/Municipal Bldg)

Thank you both for the advice.
-- Dave

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB