You are not logged in.

#1 2020-06-05 17:40:55

steeve2
New Member
Registered: 2020-06-05
Posts: 1

Landuse removals and national_parks

Someone removes numerous landuse tags from plant areas without explanation and despite the wiki explicitly suggesting the opposite:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dplant

Changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86055056
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42273 … 3/-96.1107
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449466232/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset … 3/-117.713
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70410 … -117.97171
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70410 … /-117.9672
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71991 … -119.46265

=============================

The same person also changed a number of leisure=park into boundary=national_park without providing any source (besides sattelite image) or the mandatory tags from: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag … ional_park
He might be right, that they are not leisure=park, however changing them into national_parks seems to make it rather worse than better.

Changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset … /-117.6368

Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44809697/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55677 … /-118.0258
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69387 … /-117.2759
in the last one there seems to be an overlapping issue anyway.

=============================

The user seems to be very active so I don't want to deter him. If someone with more expirience might want to talk to him?

Offline

#2 2020-06-05 21:36:20

SomeoneElse
Member
Registered: 2010-10-13
Posts: 1,496

Re: Landuse removals and national_parks

Normally I'd suggest commenting on changesets and trying to discuss with them what they're doing.  In this case it looks like a few people have tried to engage them in conversation unsuccessfully: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-disc … d=11023150 .  I'd still suggest trying to have the conversation with them, but (with a DWG hat on) I'll send them a message to let them know that people have been trying to contact them.

Offline

#3 2020-06-13 11:48:34

SomeoneElse
Member
Registered: 2010-10-13
Posts: 1,496

Re: Landuse removals and national_parks

steeve2 wrote:

The user seems to be very active so I don't want to deter him. If someone with more expirience might want to talk to him?

The user hasn't been active for a week now, so I'd suggest looking at anything mapped incorrectly that you're aware of and resolving it rather than waiting.

Best Regards,

Andy

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB