You are not logged in.

Announcement

*** NOTICE: forum.openstreetmap.org is being retired. Please request a category for your community in the new ones as soon as possible using this process, which will allow you to propose your community moderators.
Please create new topics on the new site at community.openstreetmap.org. We expect the migration of data will take a few weeks, you can follow its progress here.***

#1 2019-05-18 13:39:52

GPIOIPG
Member
Registered: 2018-08-08
Posts: 11

Critical problems about administrative boundary level of South Korea.

South Korea has unique administrative unit, Dong(동) and Li(리). Li is similar to Dong. So I explain about Dong only.

There are two type of Dong, Administrative Dong(행정동) and Legal-status Dong(법정동).

Administrative Dong is used as administrative service area of Local Autonomous Entity. And Legal-status Dong is used for address system and trading land. Boundary of these two type of dong is differ each other. (more information : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dong_(adm … _division))

Problem is that these two of dong is SAME ADMINISTRATIVE LEVEL. So boundary of Dong is conflicted.

How can I solve this problem? OSM community in South Korea couldn't get conclusion.

Offline

#2 2019-05-18 16:25:57

SK53
Member
Registered: 2009-01-11
Posts: 705

Re: Critical problems about administrative boundary level of South Korea.

Don't use boundary=administrative for both: reserve that for the actual administrative entity. For the other one use a different boundary=* tag. We have the same issue in the UK (although I think using admin_level=6 for one of those was not the best policy).

An alternative is to add a designation tag to delineate which type of legal entity it is (again we have this in the UK because we have a myriad of confusing administrative entities with different names in different part of the UK).

Offline

#3 2019-05-18 20:25:37

Jonathan Masur
Member
Registered: 2016-04-23
Posts: 104

Re: Critical problems about administrative boundary level of South Korea.

You should probably ask Wambacher here : https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65676
He's the guy in charge of controlling borders consistency in the entire world.

Offline

#4 2019-05-19 07:19:46

wambacher
Member
From: Schlangenbad/Wambach, Germany
Registered: 2009-12-16
Posts: 16,769
Website

Re: Critical problems about administrative boundary level of South Korea.

SK53 wrote:

Don't use boundary=administrative for both: reserve that for the actual administrative entity. For the other one use a different boundary=* tag.

+1

regards
walter

Offline

#5 2019-05-20 12:52:06

muralito
Member
Registered: 2012-09-04
Posts: 1,918

Re: Critical problems about administrative boundary level of South Korea.

¿And how those boundaries should be mapped so apps doing reverse geocoding can get the right address?

Offline

#6 2019-05-20 14:59:00

SK53
Member
Registered: 2009-01-11
Posts: 705

Re: Critical problems about administrative boundary level of South Korea.

@muralito: this is a widespread & common problem where postal towns & cities do not accord with administrative ones. It certainly exists in the US and UK as well.

Offline

#7 2019-05-25 04:51:23

GPIOIPG
Member
Registered: 2018-08-08
Posts: 11

Re: Critical problems about administrative boundary level of South Korea.

I appreciate your comments, Thanks.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB