You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
What do you people suggest for tagging a building which has many institutions?
The example I am talking about is a New York building holding several consulates and representations.
Offline
Such buildings usually have a name. I'd just go with that instead of trying to create a building directory.
Cheers
Offline
I would draw the building as an area (tagged as building=yes, plus name= etc). Then add nodes for the individual amenities / shops etc, in their (approximate) locations in the building.
Offline
I would draw the building as an area (tagged as building=yes, plus name= etc). Then add nodes for the individual amenities / shops etc, in their (approximate) locations in the building.
I have tried this for a shopping mall centralplaza Khon Kaen. I added only larger shops. Mapnik doesn't render all. But the data layer shows them all or better JOSM.
Offline
Did any one of you looked at the lightning presentation on the SotM09"12:10 State (lightning) 3D mapping in Japan: OSM challenge in 3D town Tokyo Japan - Miurahr at this site: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stat … e_Map_2009
Hugo
Mapping tool: Garmin HCx, Nikon Coolpix L3
Offline
I would draw the building as an area (tagged as building=yes, plus name= etc). Then add nodes for the individual amenities / shops etc, in their (approximate) locations in the building.
I think this is the right way. Maybe they won't be renderd (remember, don't map for the renderer) but they will come up in search. Also, maybe a better renderer will be made in the future.
Offline
What do you people suggest for tagging a building which has many institutions?
The example I am talking about is a New York building holding several consulates and representations.
I think, the proper way would by "relation", where building is a "site".
You can add releation to each institution.
Offline
Morten Juhl-Johansen Zölde-Fejér wrote:What do you people suggest for tagging a building which has many institutions?
The example I am talking about is a New York building holding several consulates and representations.I think, the proper way would by "relation", where building is a "site".
A site relation models an area which usually contains multiple buildings. This relation type is probably not appropriate here.
Some people use building relations, but I would likely map it like Vclaw - as a building=* outline way with nodes for the institutions placed within that outline.
OSM in 3D: OSM2World ● OSM2World Slippy Map
Offline
I think a building directory with all institution would be beneficial, if it only mentions the building one would have too look up everything else separately.
Offline
Pages: 1